|
The World Values Surveys were designed
to provide a comprehensive measurement of all major areas of human concern,
from religion to politics to economic and social life and two dimensions
dominate the picture: (1) Traditional/ Secular-rational and (2) Survival/Self-expression
values. These two dimensions explain more than 70 percent of the cross-national
variance in a factor analysis of ten indicators-and each of these dimensions
is strongly correlated with scores of other important orientations.
The Traditional/Secular-rational values dimension reflects the contrast
between societies in which religion is very important and those in which
it is not. A wide range of other orientations are closely linked with
this dimension. Societies near the traditional pole emphasize the importance
of parent-child ties and deference to authority, along with absolute standards
and traditional family values, and reject divorce, abortion, euthanasia,
and suicide. These societies have high levels of national pride, and a
nationalistic outlook. Societies with secular-rational values have the
opposite preferences on all of these topics.
The second major dimension of cross-cultural variation is linked with
the transition from industrial society to post-industrial societies-which
brings a polarization between Survival and Self-expression values. The
unprecedented wealth that has accumulated in advanced societies during
the past generation means that an increasing share of the population has
grown up taking survival for granted. Thus, priorities have shifted from
an overwhelming emphasis on economic and physical security toward an increasing
emphasis on subjective well-being, self-expression and quality of life.
Inglehart and Baker (2000) find evidence that orientations have shifted
from Traditional toward Secular-rational values, in almost all industrial
societies. But modernization, is not linear-when a society has completed
industrialization and starts becoming a knowledge society, it moves in
a new direction, from Survival values toward increasing emphasis on Self-expression
values.
A central component of this emerging dimension involves the polarization
between Materialist and Postmaterialist values, reflecting a cultural
shift that is emerging among generations who have grown up taking survival
for granted. Self-expression values give high priority to environmental
protection, tolerance of diversity and rising demands for participation
in decision making in economic and political life. These values also reflect
mass polarization over tolerance of outgroups, including foreigners, gays
and lesbians and gender equality. The shift from survival values to self-expression
values also includes a shift in child-rearing values, from emphasis on
hard work toward emphasis on imagination and tolerance as important values
to teach a child. And it goes with a rising sense of subjective well-being
that is conducive to an atmosphere of tolerance, trust and political moderation.
Finally, societies that rank high on self-expression values also tend
to rank high on interpersonal trust.
This produces a culture of trust and tolerance, in which people place
a relatively high value on individual freedom and self-expression, and
have activist political orientations. These are precisely the attributes
that the political culture literature defines as crucial to democracy.
|
|
Overview in figures. Click on
a figure to enlarge it (pop-up window).
Survival
and Well Being as related to per capita GNP. Source: R.
Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997).
|
Authority
and Value Systems. Source: R. Inglehart, Modernization
and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997). |
Mapping
Authority and Survival or Well Being. Source: R. Inglehart,
Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997). |
Scatter
chart of Authority and Survival or Well Being. Source:
R. Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997).
|
Value
type by age group, among the Publics of Britain, France, West Germany,
Italy, Belgium, and The Netherlands in 1970. Source: R.
Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997).
|
| Cohort
analysis of value change, 1970-1992. Source: R. Inglehart,
Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997). |
The
shift toward Postmaterialist Values among the Publics of nine Western
Societies. Source: R. Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization
(Princeton, 1997). |
Values
by Birth Cohort and Education Level. Source: R. Inglehart,
Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997). |
| Three
broad cultural zones: the historically Protestant, Catholic and
Communist societies. Source: R. Inglehart, Modernization
and Postmodernization (Princeton, 1997). |
| Cultural
differences are relatively enduring, but not immutable: Cross-national
differences in satisfaction with one's life as a whole, 1973-1998.
Source: R. Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization (Princeton,
1997). |
Subjective
well-being by level of economic development. Source: R.Inglehart
and H-D. Klingemann, "Genes, Culture and Happiness," MIT
Press, 2000. |
| The
collapse of communism and the decline of subjective well-being in
Russia. Source: R.Inglehart and H-D. Klingemann, "Genes,
Culture and Happiness," MIT |
Subjective
well-being by level of economic development and historical heritage
of given societies. Source: R.Inglehart and H-D. Klingemann,
"Genes, Culture and Happiness," MIT Press, 2000
|
| Economic
levels of 65 Societies, superimposed on two dimensions of cross-cultural
variation. Source: Inglehart and Baker, American Sociological
Review, February, 2000. |
Subjective
well-being and democratic institutions. Source: R.Inglehart
and H-D. Klingemann, "Genes, Culture and Happiness," MIT
|
|